By Murple: 7 June 2005
PLEASE SEND ANY
COMMENTS OR CORRECTIONS TO
MURPLE@MURPLE.NET
(mailto:murple@murple.net).
At a Glance
|
Botanical Name
|
Mitragyna
speciosa |
|
Indigenous
Range |
Southeast Asia,
Indonesia, Papua New Guinea |
|
Pharmacological Class |
Non-opioid
narcotic |
|
Active
Chemicals |
7-Hydroxymitragynine,
mitragynine, other
indoles |
|
Dose Range
|
5-15 grams dried
leaf (orally) |
Kratom is a psychoactive tree indigenous to
Southeast Asia. Commonly written in
English as kratom, the word in
Thai is กระท่อม which is pronounced [krā?tʰɔ̀ːm]
(IPA
transliteration). The Royal Thai Institute
official transliteration is krathom.
Besides kratom, it also goes by the Thai
names ithang, kakuam, and in
southern regions of Thailand, thom.
In Malaysia, it is called ketum or
biak.
Botany
Kratom refers to the
plant Mitragyna speciosa Korth.,
a tree indigenous to
Thailand,
Malaysia,
Indonesia and
Papua New Guinea. In Thailand, kratom is
mostly grown in the central and southern
regions of the country, and only rarely in
the north. The Mitragyna genus, part
of the
family
Rubiaceae (coffee
family), is found in tropical and
sub-tropical regions of Asia and Africa.
Botanically and chemically, kratom is
closely related to
yohimbe. Other relatives include
cat's claw, with which it shares several
active chemicals, coffee and
cinchona (the source of quinine). Asian
species of Mitragyna are often found
in rainforests, while the African species
(which are sometimes still classed in a
separate genus, Hallea) are often
found in swamps. In the past, plants in this
genus have been classified under the genera
Nauclea, Sarcocephalus,
Stephegyne and Uncaria. Most
species are arborescent, some reaching
heights of almost 100 feet. The genus was
given its name by Pieter Willem Korthals,
official botanist with the Dutch East India
Service from 1831 to 1836, because the
flower stigmas in the first species he
examined resembled the shape of a bishop's
miter. This genus is characterized by a
globular flowering head, bearing up to 120
florets each. During the flower bud stage,
the developing florets are surrounded and
completely covered by numerous overlapping
bracteoles. Mitragyna species are
used medicinally as well as for their fine
timber throughout the areas they grow, for
example the West African species M.
inermis and M. stipulosa are
effective traditional remedies against
malaria, the former having also been shown
by modern science to fight leukemia. Another
species, M. africanus, is used in
Nigeria to treat mental illness. The African
species M. ciliata (aka M.
ledermanni, M. stipulosa,
Hallea ciliata, Hallea ledermanni
or Hallea stipulosa) is used
traditionally to treat inflammation,
hypertension, headache, rheumatism,
gonorrhea and broncho-pulmonary diseases.
Grove of
kratom in Thailand
Mitragyna speciosa
itself reaches heights of 50 feet with a
branch spread of over 15 feet. The stem is
erect and branching. Flowers are yellow and
grow in ball-shaped clusters, as previously
mentioned. Leaves are a dark glossy green in
color, smooth,
ovate-acuminate in shape, and
opposite in growth pattern. Leaves can
grow over 7 inches long and 4 inches wide.
Kratom is evergreen rather than deciduous,
and leaves are constantly being shed and
being replaced, but there is some
quasi-seasonal leaf shedding due to
environmental conditions. During the dry
season of the year leaf fall is more
abundant, and new growth is more plentiful
during the rainy season. When grown outside
their natural tropical habitat, leaf fall
occurs with colder temperatures, around 4°
Celsius.
Kratom prefers wet,
humusy soils in a protected position, often
growing in swampy areas. Anecdotal reports
from growers in Australia indicate that it
prefers partial shade and does not like
strong winds, although others report good
results growing it in full sun. Being a
heavy feeder, it requires very rich, fertile
soil. It is drought sensitive, and if grown
out of its native habitat, sensitive to
frost. Propagation is by very fresh seed or
cuttings. There is a low strike rate, due to
an endogenous fungus which attacks xylem
tissue. In addition to propagation by
cuttings, kratom has been cloned by tissue
culture. The first plant grown in this way
was planted in February 2002 by Christian
Rätsch and Claudia Müller-Ebeling at
Wandjina Gardens (http://www.wandjina.net.au/)
in Australia. Thais believe that seed grown
kratom plants are not reliable and that half
of the plants grown from seed of a good
kratom tree will be worthless as a drug
plant. Whether this is true or folklore has
not been scientifically investigated, but
the same observation was reported by Ben of
the Botanical Preservation Corps.
Kratom flower
In recent years, kratom
has been successfully cultivated outside of
Thailand from seeds and then frequently
cloned. Most plants available outside of
Asia are clones, as seeds have only a short
period of viability. There are several clone
strains worth mentioning. The best known
clone is the Robert Rifat Clone. This plant
was originally grown in research funded by
Shaman Australis from seed collected from a
research institution in Thailand by the
Swiss scientist Claude Rifat. The parent
plant has been used in several research
studies, and presumably is the Chulalongkorn
University tree used in the Chiba University
research. The Rifat Clone has a reputation
for being especially strong, and is the most
widely available clone outside of Asia.
Another clone to come out of Shaman
Australis' research was the Craig's Clone.
This plant was grown from Thai seed
collected by Craig White in 1999 from trees
which local residents said were their
preferred kratom plants. Craig's Clone was
never developed into a commercial strain out
of deference to Rob Montgomery and the
Botanical Preservation Corps, among others,
who were developing plants in the USA from
the same batch of seeds. Tissue cultures of
the plant were put into storage medium, but
after 5 years the last of these became
unrecoverable and this clone is now lost.
However, as previously stated, other
researchers in the US were able to grow
plants from the same seed collection, which
reportedly included approximately 100 seeds
which were distributed to a variety of
botanists and collectors. Among these are
KRW 1 through 4 grown by Rick Warren, which
were used in biochemical analysis work by
Daniel Siebert. A plant was also grown from
a cutting sent by Craig White to Jim Bauml
of the Los Angeles Arboretum. Finally, there
is the Bumblebee Clone, which was grown by a
Spiritplants member named Bumble from seeds
of Vietnamese origin.
Kratom seeds
Although not
scientifically studied yet, there is
anecdotal evidence that indicates kratom
grown in climates which are cooler than
their native habitat tend to produce weak
leaves. In warmer subtropical climates,
there seems to be some seasonal variability,
with more potent leaves growing from late
summer through autumn and weak leaves in
winter and spring. Greenhouse grown plants
are reportedly also not very potent. Whether
this indicates a relationship between
temperature and alkaloid production or is
even consistently true has not been
thoroughly researched, but it seems likely
this is the case.
A related species,
Mitragyna javanica, is reportedly
used as a substitute to get around the Thai
laws banning kratom, but it is not
considered as effective. The dominant
alkaloid in this species is mitrajavine,
which has not yet been pharmacologically
tested.
Chemistry
7-Hydroxymitragynine
Mitragynine
Over 25 alkaloids have
been isolated from kratom, most of which are
yohimbe-type indoles and oxindoles. The most
abundant alkaloids consist of three indoles
and two oxindoles. The three indoles are
mitragynine, paynanthine, and speciogynine -
the first two of which appear to be unique
to this species. The two oxindoles are
mitraphylline and speciofoline. Other
alkaloids present include other indoles and
oxindoles such as ajmalicine, akuammigine,
corynanthedine, mitraversine,
rhynchophylline, speciociliatine (also
unique to kratom) and stipulatine. Working
with Malay plants, Houghton and Said found
new types of indole alkaloids (mitragynaline,
corynantheidaline, mitragynalinic acid, and
corynantheidalinic acid), in very young
leaves. Those alkaloids were reported as
having an unusual skeleton, having a carbon
function at the C14 position (compared with
previously known monoterpenoid indoles), but
Takayama et al. later revised the structure
of mitragynaline and corynantheidaline,
showing that there was no substitution on
the 14 position.
Mitragynine is the most abundant
alkaloid in the plant, and for this reason was long
assumed to be the major chemical responsible for the
effects of kratom. It was first isolated in 1907 by
David Hooper, a process repeated in 1921 by E. J.
Field, who gave the alkaloid its name. Its structure
was first fully determined in 1964 by D. Zacharias,
R. Rosenstein and E. Jeffrey. It was not until 1995
that H. Takayama et al. at Chiba University were
able to synthetically produce mitragynine. It is
structurally related to both the yohimbe alkaloids
and voacangine. It is more distantly related to
tryptamine-based psychedelic drugs such as
psilocybin, ibogaine or LSD. Chemically, mitragynine
is 9-methoxy-corynantheidine. It has the molecular
formula C23H30N2O4 and a molecular weight of 398.49.
Physically the freebase is a white, amorphous powder
with a melting point of 102-106°C and a boiling
point (bp5) of 230-240°C. It is soluble in alcohol,
chloroform and acetic acid. The hydrochloride salt
has a melting point of 243°C. It appears that it may
be a fairly stable compound, as a mitragynine ethane
disulphonate reference sample tested after fourteen
years by TLC produced results not substantially
different from fresh mitragynine picrate.
Alkaloid content varies
from place to place and at different times,
leading Shellard et al. in the 1970s
to conclude that there may be different
geographical variants within the species.
Within each location, there is a
quantitative variation in alkaloid content
from month to month as well. The alkaloid
content of the leaves of Mitragyna speciosa
has been reported as 0.5% to 1.5% in dried
leaf. An average leaf weighs about 1.7 grams
fresh or 0.43 grams dried.
The Pharmacognosy
Research Laboratories at Chelsea College
collected thirty samples of kratom from
Malaysia, Thailand, and Papua New Guinea
between 1961 and 1970. All contained
mitragynine, but beyond that there was
considerable variation. The most common
profile in Thai plants was mitragynine,
speciogynine, speciociliatine, paynantheine,
traces of ajmalicine, traces of (C9)
methoxy-oxindoles, and traces of other
indoles. This same profile was found in both
red and green petioled plants. Other Thai
plants contained different profiles, some
with many more alkaloids. Of the Malay
specimens, one contained mitragynine,
speciofoline, and other indoles and
oxindoles. The other contained mitragynine,
ajmalicine, speciogynine, speciociliatine,
paynantheine, traces of indoles, and (C9)
methoxy-oxindoles. The Papua New Guinea
specimen contained mitragynine,
speciogynine, speciociliatine, paynantheine,
specionoxeine, and isospecionoxeine.
Takayama et al. found
that Thai and Malay kratom had in common the
alkaloids mitragynine, speciogynine,
speciociliatine, paynantheine and
7-hydroxymitragynine. In both samples,
mitragynine was the most abundant alkaloid,
but in the Thai kratom it made up 66% of the
total alkaloid, while it made up only 12% of
the alkaloids from the Malay sample. The
Malay sample had mitragynaline and
pinoresinol as major components, as well as
mitralactonal, mitrasulgynine and
3,4,5,6-tetradehydromitragynine.
Beginning in the late 1990s, a
group of researchers based out of Chiba University
in Japan and Chulalongkorn University in Thailand
began researching natural and synthetic analogues of
mitragynine in search of new drugs with potential
medicinal use. These studies have led to discoveries
which have turned much of what was believed about
kratom on its head. Results of a structure-activity
relationship study published in 2002 helped to
clarify the essential structural moieties in the
Corynanthe type indole alkaloids required for opioid
agonistic activity. Two oxidative derivatives of
mitragynine, mitragynine pseudoindoxyl and
7-hydroxymitragynine, have been of particular
interest.
Mitragynine pseudoindoxyl was
first created in 1974 when a team of researchers led
by Zarembo used the fungus Helminthosporum sp. to
biotransform mitragynine and reported it to have 10
times the anti-nociceptive activity of mitragynine.
A study conducted by the Japanese and Thai
researchers previously mentioned has been found it
to be a more potent analgesic than morphine by
weight, and to act by way of mu and delta opioid
receptors. Nevertheless, in a mouse tail-flick test,
it demonstrated only weak anti-nociceptive activity
compared to morphine.
More important is the
research on 7-hydroxymitragynine (or
mitragynine hydroxyindolenine), which is a
naturally occurring minor alkaloid (around
2% of total alkaloids) first mentioned in a
paper published in 1994. In a series of
papers beginning in 2001, it has also been
shown to be highly selective for mu
receptors and is more potent by weight than
morphine. Eventually, it occurred to the
researchers that given the low potency of
mitragynine, even though it is the most
abundant alkaloid in the plant it can not
account for the effects of kratom. Bioassays
indicated that mitragynine was a much weaker
anti-nociceptive than kratom extracts.
Starting with crude extracts of kratom and
moving then to five isolated alkaloids, it
was found that 7-hydroxymitragynine is the
most likely candidate for the chief agent of
kratom's activity. It is thirty to forty-six
times more potent than mitragynine and
seventeen times more potent than morphine by
weight.
Antagonism by
naloxone was used to confirm opioid-like
activity of this alkaloid. Given that nearly
all the chemical studies of kratom have been
done on the assumption that mitragynine was
the most important alkaloid, and that nearly
all pharmacological research prior to the
late 1990s was done on mitragynine or crude
plant material, this discovery likely means
that much of what we believe about kratom
will need to be revised.
Traditional Use
Traditional use in
Thailand dates back far enough that its
beginning can't be determined. Kratom was
first mentioned to in Western literature by
Low in 1836, who wrote that people in
Malaysia would use it as a substitute when
opium was unavailable or unaffordable. In
1895, E. M. Holmes identified kratom as
Mitragyna speciosa, and again referred to
its use as an opium substitute. In 1907, L.
Wray described methods of use such as
smoking, chewing, and tea. Hoping that the
active chemical could be discovered and
analyzed for medical use, Wray also sent
leaf samples of kratom and its relative
Mitragyna parvifolia to the University of
Edinburgh, and it was from these leaves that
Field isolated mitragynine (and from M.
parvifolia, mitraversine).
In addition to being used
as a narcotic drug in its own right, it is
often used as a substitute for opium when
opium is unavailable, or to moderate opium
addiction. In folk medicine, it is often
used to treat diarrhea. A small minority of
users use kratom to prolong sexual
intercourse. In 1930, I. H. Burkill wrote
that kratom was also used as a poultice for
wounds and as a cure for fevers.
Thai and Malay users
distinguish different types of kratom, two
main kinds being distinguished by the color
of veins in the leaf - red or green
(sometimes called white). The green-veined
variety is supposed to have a stronger
effect. One study which surveyed Thai kratom
users found that most users preferred a
mixture of both, followed by red-veined
alone and then white-veined alone. Growers
in Australia report that both red and white
veining occurs at different times in
different plants which were all cloned from
the same mother plant. They have not yet
undertaken comparisons between the two.
Researchers from collected both red and
green veined samples in November 1962. Both
were listed as having the same alkaloids,
but the paper published by E. J. Shellard
did not list concentrations, nor was there
any mention of what is now believed to be
the most important alkaloid,
7-hydroxymitragynine.
Nearly all kratom use in
Thailand is by chewing fresh leaves. Other
ways it is taken include grinding up and
eating fresh, dried, or reconstituted dried
leaves. Some villagers use the leaves in
cooking. When preparing fresh leaf, the vein
is extracted and sometimes salt is added to
try and prevent constipation. Consumption of
the leaf is usually followed by drinking
something hot, such as warm water or coffee.
Leaves can also be smoked, made into a tea,
or a crude resin extraction can be made.
This resin extract is made by preparing a
water extract of the leaves, boiling it
down, and then shaping it into small balls
which are rolled in a material such as
flour, then stored until use. This is
apparently a quite popular method of
consumption.
Users of kratom tend to
be peasants, laborers, and farmers who use
the plant to overcome the burdens of their
hard work and meager existences and as a
stimulant to help endure long days working
in the fields. Female users are apparently
quite rare, perhaps because of the
association of kratom with labor in cultures
where women tend to have more domestic
roles. Age of usage onset seems to be higher
than for other drugs. Some studies have
found no addiction problems in villagers
using kratom, while others have. Based on
the pharmacology of kratom, it seems
addiction is a strong possibility with long
term use. Heavy users may chew kratom
between 3 and 10 times a day. While new
users may only need a few leaves to obtain
the desired effects, some users find with
time they need to increase doses to 10-30
leaves or even more per day.
In some parts of the
Thailand, it was said that parents would
choose to give their daughters in marriage
to men who used kratom rather than men who
used marijuana. The belief is that kratom
users are hard working, while marijuana
users are lazy. This belief is also
maintained by many of the users themselves,
who report beginning use because of a desire
to work more efficiently, and who say using
the drug gives them a strong desire to do
work.
Although mostly
associated with Thailand (many earlier texts
even indicate that kratom use is limited to
that country), kratom is also used in
Malaysia, where it is known as ketum.
It is commonly sold at roadside booths in
the form of a tea called air ketum
("kratom water") which usually sold for 1
ringgit per cup when legal and 2 ringgit
since banned. A kilogram of leaf averaged 10
ringgit when legal, and has gone up to
around 16 ringgit since banned. The Malay
version of kratom tea is made by boiling
leaves in water for two hours. This is often
cooled by placing the boiling pot into a
bucket of cold water, giving the drink a
chill haze which is considered by some
visually appealing, although it is likely
that the process of chilling serves the more
practical purpose of keeping the hot liquid
from melting the plastic cups and bags the
drink is sold in. According to Dr. Ahmad
Mahmud, deputy director of enforcement at
the Pharmaceuticals Services Division of
Malaysia's Health Ministry, children as
young as 13 have been buying air ketum
from village stalls. "From what we gather
from the sellers, the students are buying
them before school and during their breaks,"
he said, adding, "Some codeine addicts are
also drinking it to get high." These
statements were made to a reporter from the
Singaporean New Paper newspaper for an
anti-drug article, so that context should be
considered before assuming there is an
actual epidemic of childhood kratom
addiction in Malaysia. The same article
quotes Azwira Hassan, a kratom vendor from
Kedah, as saying he boiled 20 kilograms of
leaf per day and sold 250 to 300 air
ketum drinks from that. Mr. Azwira also
commented that some users felt thirsty after
drinking it, and therefore would drink more
kratom.
Kratom is used in
Malaysia in similar ways as in Thailand,
including chewing, teas, and smoking. An
article entitled "How Ketum Is Abused,"
which was published in a Malay newspaper in
2005, mentioned several unusual methods of
use, stating, "Another not so
palatable-sounding process is mixing it with
dried cow dung and tobacco, rolling it into
a cigarette and smoking it. The leaves can
also be mixed with dried coconut, ginger,
onions, nutmeg and lime and rolled with
daun kaduk (wild pepper leaf) and chewed
like daun sirih (beetle nut leaves)."
The
betel-like preparation is quite
plausible, but whether people in Malaysia
are actually smoking cow feces or this is an
attempt at propaganda is an issue for the
reader contemplate for themselves. In
addition to use as a psychoactive drug,
traditional Malay healers also use the plant
for de-worming, to improve blood
circulation, as an energizing tonic, as a
cough suppressant and to treat symptoms of
diabetes. A 1994 study by the Health
Ministry indicated that many people had used
it to get off of morphine or heroin
(although continuing to use kratom). It has
also been grown as an ornamental tree.
While kratom grows
naturally throughout Southeast Asia, there
is little evidence of its use in other
places where it grows. Myanmar has made it
illegal, which presumably indicates at least
some use there, but little is known of its
role in Burmese culture. There is reportedly
no tradition of kratom use in Indonesia. Its
status in other countries such as Papua New
Guinea, Vietnam, Laos or Cambodia is
unknown.
Pharmacology
While the main alkaloids
in kratom are structurally related to
psychedelics, their activity is radically
different. The dominant effects seem to be
similar to opioid drugs, and include
analgesia and cough suppression. Unlike
opioids, the cough suppression effect of
mitragynine does not come packaged with
emesis and dyspnoea (difficulty breathing).
Respiratory depression is also much less
than with codeine. In a 1988 paper by Jansen
and Prast it was reported that mitragynine
was not antagonized by nalorphine, leading
to confusion as to whether kratom did or did
not act in a manner similar to opioids.
However, kratom suppresses opiate withdrawal
and its effects are reversed by opiate
antagonists such as naloxone, cyprodime,
naltrindole, naloxonazine and nor-binaltorphimine,
showing that opioid receptor activity is
clearly a major element of kratom's effects.
Interestingly, while naloxone antagonizes
the analgesic effects of kratom in the
tail-flick test, it does not reverse
analgesia in the hot plate test. Kratom
alkaloids are very effective pain killers,
and work well when taken orally. These
effects are roughly comparable in strength,
but not necessarily in quality, to codeine.
These opiate-like effects appear to be
mediated mostly by delta and mu opioid
receptors, and this activity is selective
for supraspinal opioid receptors (in mice,
at least).
12 grams of
cold water extracted kratom
resin, approximately 7X
According to the
Micromedex Poisindex database, a 50mg of
pure mitragynine produces motor excitement,
giddiness,
rombergism (a swaying of the body or
falling when standing with the feet close
together and the eyes closed; the result of
loss of joint position sense), and tremors
of the face, extremities and tongue. On the
other hand, E. Macko noticed no evidence of
toxicity such as tremors or convulsions at
doses as high as 920mg/kg in dogs. In cats,
Macko found that high doses had stimulating
effects unlike unlike those from opiates.
There was increased exploratory behavior,
without the "fear and rage complex" opiates
produce.
Mitragynine also exhibits
a yohimbine-like binding to
alpha-adrenergic receptors. Stimulation
of postsynaptic
alpha-2-adrenoceptors, blockade of
5-HT2A receptors, or both, are involved in
mitragynine's suppression of 5-HT2A
mediated head-twitch response in mice. It
has been speculated that mitragynine's
activity at 5-HT2A receptors may
suppress the activity of psychedelic drugs,
which are agonists at these receptor sites.
Other effects of
mitragynine are a reduction in smooth muscle
tone, local anesthesia, and central nervous
system depression. Acute side effects may
include dry mouth, increased urination, loss
of appetite, and constipation coupled with
small, blackish stools. As with morphine,
mitragynine decreases
2-deoxy-D-glucose-stimulated gastric acid
secretion. This may have an anorexic effect
and may be involved in the weight loss
reported by some Thai users. Unlike opiates,
mitragynine does not appear to cause nausea
or vomiting in normal doses. Heavy use can
result in a prolonged sleep, although many
people find it stimulating and find sleep
difficult.
One study has found that
mitragynine has anti-malarial activity
(Gombak A strain, IC50 below 16 m g/ml).
This same study investigated mitragynine's
safety by testing for cytotoxicity against
Madin-Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cells and
human erythrocytes. No toxicity to
uninfected erythrocytes was detected at
concentrations of up to 50mg/ml or in the
MDBK cells at up to 64mg/ml.
The alkaloid thought to
be the primary active drug in kratom,
7-hydroxymitragynine, interacts with all
three major opioid sites, delta,
kappa, and mu, but bound preferentially
to mu receptors with pKi values of 8.01
±0.03. The relative affinities of
7-hydroxymitragynine for delta, kappa and mu
receptors were 5.6% and 4.6%, and 89.8%
respectively. Most research that has been
done on kratom has focused on mitragynine or
the whole plant, and since it has only
recently been discovered that
7-hydroxymitragynine is the primary drug,
there is still relatively little information
on its activity and what differences it may
have from mitragynine.
Of the other alkaloids in
kratom which have been tested,
corynantheidine shows no opioid agonistic
activity, but shows a
concentration-dependent antagonism of
morphine inhibited twitch contraction in
guinea pig ileum (intestinal tissue). It
also does not affect either the atropine or
verapamil inhibited twitch contraction.
It selectively binds to mu-opioid receptors,
so it appears that it is a competitive mu
opioid antagonist. Another alkaloid,
9-hydroxycorynantheidine, also binds
selectively to mu receptors, but it does
inhibit twitch contraction, although with a
maximum percentage lower than mitragynine.
It is believed to be a partial agonist at mu
receptors. Comparing the activity of
mitragynine, corynantheidine, and
9-hydroxycorynantheidine, it appears that
the C9 position is critical in determining
the activity of this group of alkaloids.
Mitragynine with a methoxy substituent is a
full agonist, 9-hydroxycorynantheidine has a
hydroxy substituent and is a partial
agonist, while coryntantheidine has a
hydrogen atom and is an antagonist. Another
alkaloid in kratom, speciociliatine, shows a
13-fold decrease in opioid activity relative
to mitragynine, and inhibits guinea pig
ileum twitch contraction in a
naloxone-insensitive manner. The alkaloids
speciogynine and paynantheine also inhibit
twitch contraction in a naloxone-insensitive
manner, as well as inhibiting contraction
induced by direct stimulation of muscarinic
receptors on ileal smooth muscle.
Kratom also contains
several
Uncaria alkaloids which are also
found in the South American medicinal plant
cat's claw. The most dominant one in
kratom is mitraphylline, which has shown
activity as a vasodilator and lowers blood
pressure. It is also a
myorelaxant (muscle relaxer). One study
has shown that it increases memory retention
performance in animals treated with amnesic
drugs. It also acts as a diuretic. While
there is some question as to whether or not
it shares the ability of several other
Uncaria alkaloids to enhance the activity of
phagocytes, it is proven that the
stereoisomer isomitraphylline, which is also
present in kratom, does have this property.
Isomitraphylline also has shown cytotoxic
activity against some strains of cancerous
cells (HL-60 and U-937 leukemia).
Isopteropodine, an Uncaria alkaloid
present in kratom, has been shown to be the
most effective immunostimulant of this group
of alkaloids. Rhynchophylline also lowers
blood pressure by blocking the
voltage-dependent calcium and potassium
channels, dilating peripheral blood vessels,
and lowering heart rate. It also has
antiarrhythmic properties, lowers
cholesterol and prevents blood clots by
inhibiting platelet aggregation and
thrombosis. It also has anti-inflammatory
and anti-pyretic properties. Speciophylline
(also known as uncarine-D) has shown
cytotoxic activity against leukemic cells
like isomitraphylline, slightly less
effectively against HL-60 and more effective
against U-937. Rotundifoline is another
Uncaria alkaloid found in kratom, but its
activities, if any, are not yet clearly
understood. Corynoxine A and corynoxine B
reduce locomotor activity in mice, which
appears to be due to mediating activity in
the dopaminergic system. Corynoxeine (not to
be confused with corynoxine A and B) is an
oxindole, and has verapamil-like calcium
channel antagonist.
The alkaloid ajmalicine (also called
raubasine), which is also found in Indian
snakeroot (Rauvolfia serpentina) and
Madagascar periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus),
has multiple pharmacological activities. It
inhibits platelet aggregation by means of an
inhibitory action on the release reaction of
the platelets. It increases oxygen
availability in the brain, which has led to
its use in cognitive disorders in the
elderly and in stroke ischemia, especially
in a drug combination with almitrine
marketed as Duxil. It has sedative and
anticonvulsive properties due to agonist
activity at the [3H]flunitrazepam
benzodiazepine receptor. It also acts as an
antiadrenergic by blocking
alpha-1-adrenergic receptors, which makes
ajmalicine lower blood pressure and act as a
diuretic by relaxing smooth muscle. Another
indole which kratom shares with Madagascar
periwinkle is tetrahydroalstonine, which has
been shown to lower blood sugar levels and
acts as a blocker at the alpha-2-adrenergic
receptors.
Active
Chemicals in Kratom
|
Ajmalicine
(Raubasine) |
Cerebrocirculant,
antiaggregant, anti-adrenergic (at
alpha-1), sedative, anticonvulsant,
smooth muscle relaxer |
|
Corynantheidine |
Opioid antagonist
|
|
Corynoxeine
|
Calcium channel
blocker |
|
Corynoxine A
and B |
Dopamine
mediating anti-locomotives |
|
(-)-Epicatechin |
Antioxidant,
antiaggregant, antibacterial,
antidiabetic, antihepatitic,
anti-inflammatory, anti-leukemic,
antimutagenic, antiperoxidant,
antiviral, cancer preventative,
alpha-amylase inhibitor |
|
9-Hydroxycorynantheidine |
Partial opioid
agonist |
|
7-Hydroxymitragynine |
Analgesic,
antitussive, antidiarrheal; primary
psychoactive in kratom
|
|
Isomitraphylline |
Immunostimulant,
anti-leukemic |
|
Isopteropodine
|
Immunostimulant
|
|
Mitragynine
|
Analgesic,
antitussive, antidiarrheal,
adrenergic, antimalarial, possible
psychedelic (5-HT2A)
antagonist |
|
Mitraphylline
|
Vasodilator,
antihypertensive, muscle relaxer,
diuretic, anti-amnesic, possible
immunostimulant |
|
Paynantheine
|
Smooth muscle
relaxer |
|
Rhynchophylline |
Vasodilator,
antihypertensive, calcium channel
blocker, antiaggregant,
anti-inflammatory, antipyretic,
anti-arrhythmic, antithelmintic
|
|
Speciociliatine |
Weak opioid
agonist |
|
Speciogynine
|
Smooth muscle
relaxer |
|
Speciophylline
|
Anti-leukemic
|
|
Tetrahydroalstonine |
Hypoglycemic,
anti-adrenergic (at alpha-2) |
One final chemical worth mentioning is
(-)-epicatechin. This polyphenol, the
cis-isomer of catechin, is closely
related to the well-known
EGCG. This chemical is also found in
green
tea, cranberry juice and dark
chocolate, and has a wide array of
beneficial activities. It reduces free
radicals in the blood, thereby reducing
cancer risks, and is a powerful antioxidant
which helps prevent fat cells from oxidizing
and clogging arteries. It helps treat
urinary tract infections by impairing
bacteria's ability to stick to the cell
walls of the urinary tract. Epicatechin is
used by many diabetics due to a variety of
beneficial properties. It mimics insulin and
protects
erythrocytes in a similar manner. It
also inhibits alpha-amylase, preventing the
digestion of starch into absorbable glucose.
It also keeps blood sugar levels lower by
inhibiting intestinal glucose absorption.
Epicatechin also has demonstrated ability to
inhibit growth of pathogenic bacteria such
as E. coli and staph. It also has
anti-viral properties and inhibits the
ability of virii to enter and infect cells.
Many of these secondary
chemicals in kratom are present in small
quantities, and their role in the overall
pharmacology of kratom are not yet fully
understood. It seems likely that kratom is
much more than a simple narcotic. Research
into the pharmacology of this plant and its
chemicals is still in its early stages.
The pharmacology of
kratom and mitragynine was first explored by
K. S. Grewal at the University of Cambridge
in 1932. He observed that mitragynine seemed
to act as a stimulant in both animal tissues
and a group of five male volunteers. Grewal
noted the use of kratom by laborers and
falsely concluded that mitragynine acted
like cocaine. This led to a mistaken notion
that circulated for some time that kratom
acted like a mixture of opium and cocaine.
This was also stated by Norakanphadung
Prayun in the "Thai Narcotic Book" published
1966. Grewal also reported claims that
addicts were thin, had distended stomachs,
unhealthy complexions, dark lips and dry
skin.
So far, few in depth
study of kratom's use and abuse have been
conducted. The first and best known was the
1975 study by Dr. Sangun Suwanlert of thirty
long term users in Thailand. These subjects
reported that it is sedative in low doses
changing over to stimulation in higher
doses, this seems to be incorrect. Most
other sources say that it is a stimulant in
lower doses, becoming sedative in higher
doses. Suwanalert's subjects reported
effects come on within five to ten minutes
after use, and last for several hours. The
feeling was been described as happy, strong,
and active, with a strong desire to do work.
The mind was described as calm.
Some ethnographic studies
in Thailand have reported side effects from
long term use include anorexia and weight
loss, insomnia, and a darkening of the skin,
particularly on the cheeks, giving an
appearance similar to a hepatic face. Among
those described as addicts, 30% report
limited sexual desire and the need to use a
combination of kratom and alcohol to become
sexually stimulated. Suwanalert's study
found 5 people who had psychotic conditions
which may or may not have been revealed by
very heavy kratom use.
A second study was
conducted by the Malaysian Ministry of
Health in 1994. This study surveyed 54
people who had been using kratom for 1 to 20
years. Nearly all (94.3%) had been former
users of opioids or marijuana who switched
to kratom. Users reported withdrawal when
trying to stop kratom, but pointed out that
the withdrawal was much less severe than
with opioids. Medical tests showed the users
to all be healthy and that biochemical tests
showed no significant differences from the
normal references ranges.
As discussed earlier,
addiction seems to be a possibility if high
doses are used. Some withdrawal symptoms
reported by addicts include hostility,
aggression, wet nose, inability to work,
flow of tears, muscle and bone aches, and
jerky limb movement. The first formal report
of a case of addiction was reported in 1957
by L. C. Thuan. The man had withdrawal
symptoms when trying to go without kratom,
but otherwise was physically and mentally
"quite normal," remaining in good health,
maintaining a normal weight, and never
increasing his use level. A. Marcan likewise
reports that kratom use in Malaysia was very
common, but did not have a bad reputation
and that addicts did not show any change in
their character or physical health.
The Swiss biologist
Claude Rifat experimented with a low dose of
three smoked leaves. He found the results
unimpressive: "What I observed,
subjectively, more or less reminds the
effects of the serotonin re-uptake blockers,
such as zimelidine or fluvoxamine.
Mitragynine, mainly, blocks motivations and
induce indifference, together with a strong
sense of laziness! Everything becomes boring
to do." Given the usual dose ranges reported
by kratom users, it seems probable that this
dose was insufficient to produce anything
more than placebo or threshold activity.
With the increased
availability of kratom outside of Asia, it
has become possible to collect much new data
on the effects. This is interesting because
many of these new users are from Western
cultures and therefore it is now possible to
gather data free from traditional cultural
beliefs and without going through the filter
of ethnobotanical research papers. There is
now a wide body of first hand reports from
people who have used kratom, and it is now
possible to use this data to get a clearer
understanding of the effects of this plant
and to resolve some of the inconsistencies
and errors in earlier research conducted
only in kratom's indigenous environment. For
the most part, however, effects reported by
non-native users are in line with earlier
reports. Most use is oral, in the form of
teas or swallowed extracts. Doses reported
depend on the quality of kratom used (which
seems to have considerable variability) and
tolerance of the user, but range from 5 or
less grams to 20 grams. Effects reported are
often compared to opioids, although there
are subjective differences. Effects come on
within 10 to 20 minutes and continue to
build for up to an hour after consumption.
The primary effects generally seem to last
for 3 to 6 hours, although some users report
lingering stimulant or sedative effects for
a few hours more.
Regarding side effects,
very few are reported in normal doses, with
the exception of occasional insomnia or
constipation (which is considerably less
pronounced than with opioids). In unusually
high doses, or when novice users take doses
which would be considered moderate to high
in experienced users, some unpleasant side
effects do occur. Most common is nausea,
occasionally with vomiting. A sensation of
heat or sweating is sometimes reported.
Dizziness, vertigo, and nystagmus can occur.
There is at least one report of some sort of
hallucinogenic or deliriant activity with a
very high dose (nearly double what an
experienced user might take, taken by a
first time user).
Medical Applications
Small kratom
plant in Indonesia
Several possible uses for
kratom, its alkaloids, and synthetic
derivatives are worthy of investigation.
Inspired by traditional
use, H. Ridley reported In 1897 that the
leaves of Mitragyna speciosa were a cure for
opium addiction. In more recent times,
mitragynine has reportedly been used in New
Zealand for methadone addiction detox. This
treatment in New Zealand is mentioned first
in The Ibogaine Story, but no other
references to this treatment are available,
and it seems likely it never existed.
According to the story, kratom was smoked
whenever the patient experienced withdrawal
symptoms, over a 6 week treatment period.
Patients reported a visualization effect
taking place at night in the form of vivid
hypnagogic dreams. While working on plans
for ibogaine experiments in the USA, Cures
Not Wars activist Dana Beal suggested that
mitragynine could be used as an active
placebo for comparison in the study. Acting
Deputy Director of the NIDA Charles
Grudzinskas rejected the proposal, however,
saying that even less was known about
mitragynine than ibogaine. In the Australian
National Drugs and Poisons Schedule
Committee's meeting notes on kratom, after
mentioning that the NDPSC received a comment
regarding the New Zealand story, there is a
note reading, "A member advised there are no
listings for either mitragynine or Kratom
being used in a clinical study or as a
registered product in New Zealand." The
concluding paragraph of Jansen and Prast's
1988 article in the Journal of
Ethnopharmacology states: "kratom may have a
special role as a replacement for methadone
in addiction treatment programs." Jansen and
Prast were based out of the University of
Auckland in New Zealand, so a likely
explanations is that Beal simply
misinterpreted the article.
Although chemically
similar, ibogaine and the kratom alkaloids
work by different pathways, and have
different applications in treatment of
narcotic addiction. While ibogaine is
intended as a one time treatment to cure
addiction, kratom alkaloids may be used to
gradually wean the user off narcotics.
Kratom or its derivatives could also perhaps
be used as a maintenance drug for addicts
not wishing to quit but trying to moderate
an out of hand addiction. In either case,
kratom serves in a manner similar to
methadone or buprenorphine, as a substitute
narcotic. The advantages of kratom are that
it is legal in most countries and that
anecdotal evidence indicates that it is both
safer and easier to withdraw from. Whether
or not this is actually true needs to be
confirmed by controlled scientific research.
In the mean time, people seeking to use
kratom in a self-administered treatment for
narcotics addiction need to be aware that
kratom is potentially addictive itself, and
that if used irresponsibly, certainly will
not provide a pathway to a drug-free life.
Kratom certainly has potential in addiction
therapy as a slow detox or long term
maintenance drug, but unlike ibogaine, is
not seen as offering a cure.
One potential advantage
of kratom over currently used opioids is the
array of secondary chemicals such as
ajmalicine, epicatechin and the Uncaria
alkaloids. These chemicals have a variety of
medicinal properties, including antioxidant
activity, cardiovascular benefits, and
ability to fight off various viral and
bacterial infections and to act as immune
stimulants. This gives kratom advantages
over opioid narcotics in several
applications. If used as a replacement for
codeine as a cough suppressant, the immune
enhancing properties would offer potential
benefits in helping fight off whatever
infection is causing the coughs. Used as a
mild pain killer in people recovering from
injuries or surgeries, the immune enhancing
properties could also help reduce the chance
of infections in the site of the injury or
operation. Used as a replacement for
methadone or buprenorphine, the various
health benefits of the secondary kratom
chemicals could help the addict recover from
the poor health that is often seen in long
term drug abusers. While more research is
required to find out how effective these
minor drugs in kratom are, it is certain
that opioid narcotics do not have these
properties at all. The potential advantages
certainly merit further investigation of
kratom as an alternative to opioids. It
would also be worthwhile to research the
possibility of extracting the non-narcotic
chemicals from kratom and developing them
into medicines.
In the early 1970s, the
pharmaceutical company Smith, Kline and
French Laboratories researched mitragynine,
including pre-clinical trials in humans. In
a personal letter to Karl Jansen in 1986, R.
Raffauf indicated that this research was
discontinued because of unacceptable acute
side effects of some kind. Meeting notes
from the mitragynine scheduling hearings in
Australia note: "It has been speculated that
a possible reason for this is the different
pharmacological profiles of pure mitragynine
and the unprocessed leaf, the latter
containing several other alkaloids that may
modify the effects of the pure drug." After
being contacted by the Committee,
GlaxoSmithKline (the modern incarnation of
the company), said they did not object to
scheduling in Australia, presumably
indicating a lack of any further interest in
developing medicines from kratom.
In 1999, Pennapa
Sapcharoen, director of the National
Institute of Thai Traditional Medicine in
Bangkok said that kratom could be prescribed
both to opiate addicts and to patients
suffering from depression, but stressed that
further research is needed, and that any
potential use of kratom in treating addicts
needs to be part of a holistic approach,
saying, "We have to pay attention not only
to the medicine itself but also to the
application process." She said the current
laws against kratom make investigation of
kratom as a medicine difficult, but Viroj
Sumyai, director of the Thai Food and Drug
Administration's narcotics control division
has denied that the law banned the use of
kratom in research, adding that
Chulalongkorn University chemists have
isolated mitragynine which researchers can
obtain for study. Material from
Chulalongkorn University has been used in
the extensive research based out of Chiba
University in Japan. Samlee Chaidee, of
Chulalongkorn University's pharmacy
department, said the herb was a part of
country life before the state stepped in,
and that studies have shown villagers using
it did not have problems with addiction. All
parties have stressed the need for further
research.
In Malaysia in 2005, Dr.
Mustafa Ali Mohd, Associate Professor at the
Universiti Malaya, Pharmacology Department,
announced his desire to study the effects of
kratom use, pointing out that the only in
depth study of kratom users has been
Suwanalert's research on thirty Thai users
in 1975. Unfortunately, since Malaysia made
it illegal, the police have been cutting
down trees. While Mohd and other scientists
have been publicly upset over this campaign,
Deputy Internal Security Minister Datuk Noh
Omar was quoted saying that unless the
scientists can find people to guard every
tree to prevent youth from using the leaves
to get high, the police should be allowed to
chop them down. ACP Nooryah Md Anwar of the
Royal Malaysian Police’s Narcotic Department
at Bukit Aman has countered that planting
kratom is not illegal under the Section 30
(3) of the Poisons Act, and that the police
do not have the authority to cut down trees.
Nooryah said, “If it is a drug, it is a
drug. We would like to have it listed under
the Dangerous Drugs Act as that gives us
more power and governs even the planting of
the tree. We have observed that the dosage
and frequency of use have gone up.” Dr. Mohd
believes that kratom has medicinal
applications such as use in weaning addicts
off opioids. Professor Datuk Ikram Said of
Univeristi Kebangsaan Malaysia believes
kratom alkaloids can also be turned into
useful medical pain killers,
anti-inflammatories, cough medicines, and
treatments for diarrhea. Since the plant is
indigenous to Malaysia, these scientists
believe development of kratom-derived drugs
could save the country millions of ringgit
in imported drug costs. A national committee
to investigate kratom has been formed in
Malaysia.
First Hand Reports
Freshly
picked kratom leaf with green
("white") petiole
Most reports from kratom
users are positive.
A person calling
themselves Lightwarden wrote a summary of
their experiences with kratom. Doses under
10 grams were compared to a mild caffeine
type stimulant. With doses in the 10-15 gram
range, "the wonders of this miracle plant
are revealed." Lightwarden says the initial
effects start in around about ten minutes
after drinking the tea, and describes it by
saying, "The buzz is characterized by waves
of pleasure running through my limbs,
particularly in my extremities. After about
a half an hour to 45 minutes, the buzz
strengthens considerably." The description
continues, "It is very euphoric, and makes
my body feel wonderful. It also seems to
reduce pain by a lot, or at least make me
care less about it. I should mention that
smoking cannabis, especially out of a bong
or other high-powered water pipe, is nearly
a must for me, as it synergizes extremely
well. The full effects last for about two
hours, and then the pleasant after-effects,
which for me are mostly just like a reduced
version of the full effects, last for
another couple of hours generally." The
writer has experience with opioids and
reports kratom has fewer side effects. The
author goes on to mention some other
miscellaneous observations, for example,
"although some people have stated that they
enjoy a little alcohol with their kratom, I
find that to be a bad combination
personally, as both times I have tried I
ended up with less euphoria, more dizziness,
and a minor headache." The writer also
mentions a friend who had an oxycodone and
hydrocodone addiction who was using kratom
to get off the opioids.
Kratom leaf
with red petiole
A writer going by the
name sepulfreak indicates that using the
Rifat strain, low doses of 1.5-2 grams
produce stimulation and mild perceptual
changes and euphoria. At 4 grams, more
narcotic type effects become dominant. With
doses of 6-6.5 grams, the writer indicates
medicinal potential, indicating, "I have
actually used it for back pain before, and
it worked better than any reasonable dose of
a pharmaceutical Opiate/Opioid I've used."
Contrasting kratom to opioids, sepulfreak
says, "With other Opiates/Opioids, I feel
like I'm always trying to hide something or
use them as some sort of escape, but this
seems to actually help me through things. I
get some empathy and heart opening happiness
that causes me to talk about personal
issues. Unlike other Opiates/Opioids, I
don't feel like it was for nothing the next
day. There is somewhat of an Opiate
hangover, though I don't crave and feel the
detox. I feel satisfied." Having tried it at
a higher dose, 9 grams, some effects not
associated with opioids were manifested. "My
vision was extremely distorted, and there
was actually a mild hallucinogenic effect.
The trees seemed to sway a bit, and my sense
of vision was enhanced. Colors seemed
brighter, and the euphoria was beyond
powerful. I was really warm, and I just
layed in the autumn leaves in the middle of
a beautiful hollow in the woods. There were
lots of large Red and White Oak trees around
the area too. I felt a strong connection
with nature. I felt unity and admiration of
God's creation." The writer points out that
there was some mild, opioid-like nausea at
the higher doses though. In conclusion, the
author says kratom "is a good pain reliever,
it motivates the mind and body for work and
study, and gives me a profound sense of well
being."
Many people did not get
quite so positive experiences, yet did not
have negative experiences either. These
people find kratom uninteresting or only
slightly positive or negative.
Writing under the name
sile na gig, one user tried kratom twice,
feeling mildly positive effects, but also
some nausea the second time. In conclusion,
"Frankly, it's more trouble than just
rolling a spliff and getting stoned. I'd
rather find something as user-friendly as
pot without the risk of it being detected in
a urine test."
Cactushead found the
experience moderately enjoyable, but
overrated, saying, "For the money, it’s
probably not worth it though. Honestly, I
can’t believe that this is illegal in some
parts of the world. The effects are
noticeable, but certainly not anything that
would impair a person, or become addictive."
In conclusion, "I have mixed feelings about
Kratom. The positive side is that at the
peak of the experience, this really is a
good opiate substitute (without many of the
negative aspects of opiates.) However, the
peak lasted only about a half hour; so
between the mild nausea and the expensive
price, I’d say that this isn’t something
I’ll purchase again. It certainly has the
feel of an opiate, although there is
something missing. I didn’t find Kratom to
be as euphoric as traditional opiates, but I
think it is also much less likely to be
addictive. While it was worth a try, I would
not consider buying it again unless I could
find a cheaper source."
Virtually all of the
negative reports involving kratom involve
either large doses, multi-drug combinations,
or addictive use.
One report by an
inexperienced user going by the name Jesper
likens a 15 gram dose to an "instant
hangover" characterized by nausea,
dizziness, nystagmus, and a sensation of
heat. Jesper concluded, "I think I’ll stick
with the illegal drugs for a while since
they seem to be much safer and reliable than
any legal ones."
One user, using the
pseudonym f, reported taking a dose of 23
grams of kratom on the first try. This
resulted in rapid heartbeat, severe nausea,
a sensation that everything was rapidly
moving around and through his or her person,
and some sort of hallucinogenic activity.
The report says, "I had to close my eyes,
and began to hallucinate somewhat. The
hallucinogenic aspect to this was not like
other psychedelics. I had powerful visual
impressions in a way, and they were vivid,
but I didn't exactly see them. It was more
that I had the feeling that I was seeing
them and experiencing them, very hard to
explain. But the scenarios I was perceiving
were getting stranger and much faster.
Finally the nausea was just way too much,
and I sprinted to the bathroom projectile
vomiting. This was now probably 90 minutes
into the experience. I was in the bathroom
for 1-2 hours, vomiting and heaving,
unable/willing to move. The body feeling was
related to the feeling of an anxiety attack
or the onset of a bad trip, although I
didn't literally feel anxious. Mentally. It
was just a blur. Impressions like above just
blasted through my mind constantly, so
quickly I only had the sensation of the rate
of change of the hallucinations and not of
any one hallucination. Again this is very
hard to explain."
An anonymous user
reported experiencing withdrawal after using
kratom continually for nearly a year. For
most of that time, use was in low doses, one
to three times per week, and no physical
addiction was noticed. After increasing use
to near daily for a few months and noticing
tolerance, the user decided to abstain. The
resulting withdrawal was described thusly:
"Just the second full day of no kratom I
became very irritable. I tried to keep
myself busy to no avail. I remained
irritable and very restless until the fourth
full day. Due to my feelings of
restlessness, I slept only several hours per
night in the second through fourth nights.
The fifth full day I noticed I could relax,
and that night I slept like a baby. I can't
explain the feeling of pure anxiety I
experienced as my body went through (real!)
withdrawals. I noticed achy muscles and mild
depression as well." In spite of this, the
user says, "Kratom is an awesome drug. I
believe it's very safe if used
occasionally."
A user going by the names
Patient and UK Patient switched from using
high doses of opioids (fentanyl,
morphine,
oxycodone, and
hydrocodone) to using kratom, mistakenly
believing that simply switching to kratom
was a way to cure the addiction. Describing
the withdrawal from this multiple drug
addiction, UK Patient writes, "The first few
days are almost identical to serious
hydrocodone withdrawal. But it is days 4-14
that catch me off guard. Fatigue sets in.
Followed by 2-3 days 'lost' to relative
detachment from my surroundings. Then I am
welcomed back by a CRIPPLING depression." No
timeline is given for how long the kratom
was used, nor for how long or how many times
Patient was addicted to opioids before
switching to kratom.
Writing under the name
K-ally, a user describes discovering kratom
after years of occasional narcotic use
culminating in a year of daily oxycodone
use, writing, "back in December after
getting over a three week withdrawal from
heavy oxycodone (100mg to get me high) and
methadone (50mg to keep me nice and level),
I discovered Kratom. I learned that it was
no ordinary legal high, and this stuff was
actually like an opiate. I start taking it
2-3 times a day and my tolerance skyrockets;
at first I only required 3 grams of leaf,
now I was using up to 10 grams here in
March. Kratom was being used on top of
occasional oxycodone, which my tolerance was
quite high for, so there is without question
cross-tolerance between Kratom and opioids."
This person goes on to say, "I started
having side effects from my use, like
depression. I figured it was time to quit,
for real, and I was really scared.
Withdrawal has given me days of hell on
earth, pure torture of the mind and soul. A
week earlier I had stopped my use for almost
two days, in a failed attempt to quit. The
withdrawal set in in about 20 hours and was
absolutely hell, so I eagerly ate more
Kratom." Deciding not to continue the cycle,
the user writes, "I go through the horrible
process again, my final time, like I always
said. This time I scattered my remaining
Kratom through the garbage can. Pure anxiety
hits me after a day, along with stomach
problems, twitching, and horrible insomnia."
On the second day of withdrawal, this person
decided to take an
intramuscular injection of 110mg
ketamine. Interestingly, this user
reported having a profound experience with
the ketamine, and upon waking the next
morning felt no more withdrawal symptoms.
The report was written over a week after the
ketamine experience, at which time the user
had neither used more kratom or opioids nor
experienced a return of any withdrawal
symptoms.
A somewhat contrasting
report comes from a user named Duncan, who
was not using kratom to come off opioids. He
writes, "I personally used a high dose of
Kratom EVERY day for about 1 1/2 years. It
got to point where I began to no longer
appreciate the plant and I decided to stop.
There were actually NO cravings at all after
that to continue using it although there
were definitely withdrawal symptoms. I found
it difficult to sleep at night, had bad
diarrhea and was quite depressed for about
10 to 14 days. All the above symptoms
gradually wore off and everything got back
to normal again. I abstained for about 4
months and am now using kratom only twice a
week without any negative effects." He adds,
"I would say it is definitely EASY to quit
but if used for a long period of time it is
better to slowly stop using it over a period
of time rather than suddenly thus reducing
the negative symptoms."
Law
Kratom remains legal in
most of the world. There are a few
exceptions, however. Unfortunately, it is
likely that more countries will eventually
ban kratom or its active chemicals.
The Thai government
passed the Kratom Act 2486 which went into
effect on August 3, 1943. This law makes
planting the tree illegal and requires
existing trees to be cut down. This law was
not found effective, since the tree is
indigenous to the country. Today, kratom is
classed in the same enforcement group as
cocaine and heroin by Thai law, and has the
same penalties. Thailand has the death
penalty for high level drug trafficking
offenses, a fact which has spawned a myth in
the United States that kratom possession is
punishable by death. In practice,
distributors are jailed for up to two years
and fined up to 20,000
baht, and consumers can be jailed up to
a month or fined up to 1000 baht. As with
prohibition laws elsewhere in the world,
this has succeeded only at increasing black
market prices. In 2001, the Thai Narcotics
Control Board issued a report indicating
that kratom was the second most widely
abused illegal drug in the country, after
marijuana. 1270 kilograms were seized by
Thai authorities in 2001, and it was
estimated that two million Thais had used
the drug.
Myanmar (formerly Burma)
declared Mitragyna speciosa a controlled
narcotic drug under Section 30 (b) of the
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances
Law in a Ministry of Health notice dated
Yangon, the 6th Waxing Day Tabodwe, 1354 ME
(28 January 1993).
Mitragynine was made
illegal in Malaysia in 2003, and kratom
leaves in August 2004. In June, 2004, a four
day operation by Malay authorities resulted
in the arrest of 15 people and the seizure
of over 800 liters of prepared tea and 245
kilograms of kratom leaves in the states of
Terengganu, Pahang and Kelantan. Other
operations were conducted in 2003 and 2004,
and presumably are ongoing. In November
2004, Parliamentary Secretary to the Natural
Resources and Environment Ministry Sazmi
Miah and others spoke out against an
incident where 43 policemen along with local
villagers chopped down a 30 meter tall 60
year old kratom tree in Kampung Badariang
(near Gerik). Home Affairs Minister Datuk
Azmi Khalid said the police should have
carried out a study first before cutting it,
and focus instead on the more serious
problem of synthetic drug abuse. Many feel
that cutting down kratom trees harms the
biodiversity of the region. The local deputy
district police chief, Ismail Deraksa,
defended the action by saying the sixty year
old tree was cut down to prevent the
emergence of a new addiction in the youth.
Slightly more than 1000 kilograms of the
leaves and under 236,000 liters of the drink
have been seized since kratom was made
illegal. As of April 2005, there have been
99 cases involving kratom, 29 people have
been charged, but no one has been jailed.
Penalties in Malaysia include fines of up to
10,000 ringgit or jail terms up to four
years or both.
The most recent country
to ban kratom was Australia. The National
Drugs and Poisons Schedule Committee held
several meetings between February 2003 and
February 2004 to consider including
mitragynine and Mitragyna speciosa into
Schedule 9 of the Standard for the Uniform
Scheduling of Drugs and Poisons. The NDPSC
39th Meeting in October 2003 agreed to
schedule mitragynine, and 40th Meeting in
February 2004 agreed to add kratom to
Schedule 9 as well, pending review of public
comments. Although several comments were
received arguing that kratom was relatively
harmless and had potential therapeutic
value, the Committee pointed out the
widespread sale and promotion of kratom on
the internet was reason to believe it was a
potential problem drug. Regarding potential
medical uses, the NDPSC meeting minutes
state, "A Member noted that based on the
available data there was little evidence to
show that M. speciosa was widely used for
therapeutic purposes other than as a
substitute for other addictive opiates and
one other traditional use as an
antidiarrhoeal. Although the pharmacology of
M. speciosa suggested that analgesic effects
were likely given the findings of studies
quoted in several papers [e.g. Journal of
Psychoactive Drugs (Vol 20[4], Oct-Dec
1988], there was little data to suggest that
Kratom was used traditionally as a pain
reliever. On this basis, the Committee noted
that despite post-meeting comments about the
usefulness of M. speciosa for treating
migraines, there was little evidence
available to support a legitimate
therapeutic need for the plant and members
also noted that a number of other
alternatives including complementary
medicines were already available. A Member
observed that information on Internet
websites referred mainly to the use of
Kratom for producing psychoactive effects
and in contrast, there was paucity of
information about its therapeutic use." The
NDPSC then confirmed the decision to
schedule kratom, and the amended SUSDP law
went into effect 1 January 2005.
Furthermore, a New Zealander on the
Committee suggested that Australia should
officially recommend to New Zealand that it
also schedule kratom.
Mellow Gold
 |
"Mellow Gold"
fake kratom leaf material |
 |
"Mellow Gold"
fake kratom seeds |
Beginning in late 2002,
Bruno Phillips of Ebotashop, a botanical
vendor located in France, began marketing a
product which was alleged to be kratom
imported from Myanmar (where kratom is
illegal). This product was sold to other
vendors as well as through Ebotashop. Many
exotic botanical retailers around the world
carried it, Shaman Australis estimates that
100 kilograms or more in total may have been
sold to vendors at prices from $200 to $600
per kilogram. Some retailers produced
extracts of this alleged kratom, either as a
"full-spectrum alkaloid free-base" or as an
extract made using vinegar which was called
"mitragynine acetate" - or even more
incorrectly, "kratom acetate." One vendor
who had purchased this plant material,
Daniel Siebert, began to notice that the
leaves did not match published botanical
descriptions of kratom. Notably, the leaves
had some hairs. Daniel Siebert did a TLC
analysis, and Mark Brady of MJB Botanicals
did an HPLC analysis, and neither test
indicated the presence of mitragynine. The
TLC analysis did not produce any visible
indole spots with Ehrlich's reagent.
However, the HPLC results had two peaks with
retention times similar to yohimbine,
leading Brady to speculate that it could
contain similar alkaloids. The alkaloid
content of the dried leaf was approximately
4%, although the alkaloids remain
unidentified. Some companies kept selling
the product after this discovery, but
renamed it to "Mellow Gold." Many people who
have tried it report psychoactivity of some
kind, while others have reported no
activity. No harmful effects have been
reported. Seeds from the same source were
also available, and sold through various
resellers as well. Based on examination of
the leaves and seeds, some have theorized
that this material could be Mitragyna
parvifolia, but this is only a guess.
Whether the psychoactivity reported for
"Mellow Gold" is real or placebo is also
uncertain.
Personal Observations
Kratom is a fascinating
plant with great potential. I first became
interested in it after reading some passing
references to this psychoactive tree from
Thailand in books such as Jonathan Ott's "Pharmacotheon"
and "Plants of the Gods" by Schultes and
Hofmann in the late 1990s. This grabbed my
interest, as I was born and spent much of my
childhood in Thailand and had grown up
surrounded by Thai culture. I had never
heard of kratom however. There was very
little information available on kratom at
that time, so it lingered in the back of my
mind until 1999, when a very small quantity
of dried leaf became available and was
briefly sold by a mail-order specialty
botanicals supplier after an intrepid
individual brought 10-15 kilograms of leaf
and some seeds home from Thailand. I
purchased 10 grams for $25 sometime in 2000.
There was no practical information available
other than the catalog listing which said
kratom could be used "for producing a
distinctive sedation coupled with a
paradoxical physical exhilaration" along
with a mental state described as "putting
one's pieces together" when feeling
scattered or fatigued. the which suggested
doses of around a gram could be chewed,
smoked, or made into tea for effects that
were both stimulating and relaxing. This was
in line with the little information I'd run
across in books, which mentioned that it was
usually chewed or smoked. I tried smoking
and chewing it several times, with no
results. Finally when I was down to 5 grams,
I decided to try tea. This finally produced
results - not very strong, but certainly
enjoyable. I tried to order more, but there
had only been a small supply and it was
already sold out.
I was able to obtain a
small sample of kratom from an associate a
few months later, and it became possible to
find real kratom commercially again
beginning in 2003. Likewise, scientific
information became easier to obtain, and
realizing that my "Kratom: What Is It?"
paper was bursting with errors, I decided to
begin researching kratom for a new paper. As
often happens, life and other projects
delayed this project for some time, and I
didn't begin seriously researching or
experimenting with kratom much until the
summer of 2004. For the past few months I
have researched kratom in depth, and have
come to have a deep appreciation for the
plant. I also have found it to be a useful
and enjoyable plant, and it is a valuable
element of my herbal medicine cabinet.
On paper, reading about
the pharmacology, it can seem as if kratom
is virtually interchangeable with opioids.
The reality is somewhat different. Certainly
there are many similarities, as would be
expected of a plant with at least two opioid
receptor agonist chemicals. I have had
fairly extensive experience with opioids
including codeine, oxycodone, buprenorphine,
opium poppies and others, and I consider
myself well versed in their effects and the
differences between them. Kratom has a
substantially different feel from opioid
narcotics, both in the short and long term.
Serious pharmacological research into kratom
has only barely begun, and it seems likely
that as more is learned about it, science
will be able to quantify these differences.
Perhaps 7-hydroxymitragynine and mitragynine
are active at more receptors than currently
thought, or perhaps there are as yet
undiscovered active chemicals in the plant
which modify the activity of the whole. Or
perhaps the properties of the kratom
alkaloid molecules are such that even just
binding to the opioid receptors, they
produce activity which is not the same as
opioids.
Whatever the reason,
there are notable differences. In a
superficial sense, the high produced by
kratom feels somewhat like that of opioids.
There is a warm, tingly sensation which will
certainly feel familiar to people
experienced with opioids. Kratom is useful
as a pain killer and a cough suppressant,
and I have used it for both purposes with
results just as good as with opioids. While
kratom is used to treat diarrhea in Thailand
and Malaysia, I personally have found that
it has very little constipating effect
compared to opioids. Fortunately, I have not
had the opportunity to try it as a diarrhea
remedy, but based on the near lack of
constipation I've gotten from it, I'm
skeptical that it will work nearly as well
as opioids. A major difference between
kratom and opioids is the stimulating
property of kratom. There are some opioids,
mostly
thebaine derivatives such as hydrocodone
or oxycodone, which are stimulant in the
sense that they can cause insomnia. Kratom
produces more of a real stimulation, giving
a focused energy which lasts for several
hours and is well suited to engaging in
productive and creative work, exercize, or
for social situations. I am particularly
fond of going on long nature hikes after a
cup of kratom tea. This is in stark contrast
to opioids, which tend to promote more
sedentary activities (or lack thereof).
While kratom is relaxing, it does not seem
to act like as much of a CNS depressant as
opioids do. I have never nodded off or even
slid into daydreams with kratom like with
opioids. The mind feels active and alert -
tranquilized perhaps, but not sedated. There
also is no real noticeable come down from
kratom. The effects gradually and smoothly
transition back to baseline consciousness,
and I have never experienced a hangover or
crash of any sort.
In the long term, kratom
does not seem to have nearly the reinforcing
lure to compulsive use that opioids have.
However, I'm sure that for some people, it
will, and that anybody who overuses it has
the potential to develop a physical and/or
psychological dependence. Even with periods
of frequent use, kratom does not seem to
produce the effects I have experienced from
opioids, such as constipation, lack of
motivation, reduced sex drive, or general
feelings of reduced health. In fact, when I
use it, I generally feel energetic and
healthy, and the pharmacology of many of its
chemical components does provide evidence
that occasional moderate use of kratom is
not only safe but potentially beneficial.
I have mostly
experimented with kratom as a tea. With most
material I have sampled, 5 grams will make a
tea with noticeable effects, and 15 grams
will produce the strongest effects which I
still find enjoyable. With some of the more
potent material I have tried, 10 grams can
be rather strong, but in my experience the
stronger strains which are sold as "super"
or "premium" kratom are not really worth the
money. While these varieties often cost four
or five times more, I have found them to
only be around 50% stronger than the
standard material I've used. I have found
smoking kratom to be a complete waste,
although an associate told me that smoking 3
grams of leaf did produce some effects. I
haven't had much luck with chewing it, but I
haven't really explored that route much. It
works well as a tea, and since oral
consumption is generally the safest way to
use any drug, I probably wouldn't recommend
any other methods for using it.
Conclusion
 |
The sort of
unethical marketing that gets
drugs banned: "It's a lot nicer
than being stoned" |
|
 |
Another
example of greed trumping wisdom |
In conclusion, there
needs to be much more research done into
this plant and its active constituents,
especially in light of the recent discovery
that mitragynine is not the chemical
primarily responsible for kratom's activity.
Although kratom has been used since time
immemorial by Thai natives, Western science
hasn't paid it that much attention. What
research does exist contains some apparent
conflicts and errors. Knowledge even of the
plant's existence outside of Southeast Asia
has been limited to ethnobotanists and a
handful of pharmacology researchers until
the last few years, and availability of live
plants and dried leaves has been practically
non-existent until very recently.
Beginning in 2004, I
began seeing kratom sold in tacky,
exploitive ways by people seeking to make
money off it. This pattern has sadly
repeated itself more times than I care to
remember. An interesting drug is made
available by traders and vendors with
integrity and ethics, and sold discretely.
Then, some greedy bastard discovers it and
sets up a sleazy website and begins
aggressively marketing it with no regard for
the consequences. Sooner or later, people
begin doing stupid things because of a lack
of adequate education. The drug comes to the
attention of the media or authorities, and
eventually is made illegal. It saddens me
greatly that people are willing to push
kratom in such unethical ways, encouraging
reckless use by hyping up how fun it is,
promoting it as similar to or better than
opium or marijuana, not making the attempt
to educate their customers and urge
moderation, and advertising in ways so
aggressively that it seems inevitable that
it will eventually come to the attention of
the wrong people.
Kratom is a special plant
with both recreational and medicinal value
which is only beginning to be understood.
There is much to learn, and hopefully
humanity will have the opportunity to learn
what this plant has to offer before it too
falls victim to the drug war juggernaut.
Credits
-
Botanical Preservation Corps (http://www.botanicalpreservationcorps.com/).
Personal email from Ben: 6 May 2005,
orders@botanicalpreservationcorps.com
- Carbonin PU, Greco A, Pisanti P,
Gemma A, Cattelin F. "Efficacy of
almitrine-raubasine in cognitive
disorders of aging: a double-blind,
placebo-controlled, clinical and
psychometric study": Clin
Neuropharmacol. 1990;13 Suppl 3:S92-9
- Charveron M, Assie MB, Stenger A,
Briley M. "Benzodiazepine agonist-type
activity of raubasine, a rauwolfia
serpentina alkaloid": Eur J Pharmacol.
1984 Nov 13;106(2):313-7
- Darklight. Personal email: 6 May
2005
- De Rienzo P, Beal D, The Statten
Island Project.
"The Ibogaine Story" (http://www.cures-not-wars.org/ibogaine/iboga.html)
- Hanna, Jon.
"Bogus Kratom Market Exposed" (http://www.murple.net/yachay/archives/kratom/bogus-kratom-er.pdf):
Entheogen Review, Spring 2003;
XII(1):26-28, Errata
- Horie S, Koyama F, Takayama H,
Ishikawa H, Aimi N, Ponglux D, Matsumoto
K, Murayama T.
"Indole alkaloids of a Thai medicinal
herb, Mitragyna speciosa, that has
opioid agonistic effect in guinea-pig
ileum" (http://www.murple.net/yachay/archives/kratom/7-hydroxymitraginine-primary-active.pdf):
Planta Med., March 2005; 71(3):231-6
- Merck & Co., Inc. "The Merck Index":
12th edition, 1996.
- Mohamed AF, Matsumoto K, Tabata K,
Takayama H, Kitajima M, Watanabe H.
"Effects of Uncaria tomentosa total
alkaloid and its components on
experimental amnesia in mice:
elucidation using the passive avoidance
test": J Pharm Pharmacol. 2000
Dec;52(12):1553-61
- National Drugs and Poisons Schedule
Committ
|